|
|
THIS WEEK IN PRACTICE |
|
Two weeks into the coding and compliance focus, and this week we’re tackling a related topic that doesn’t get nearly enough attention: underpayments. Every week your practice is likely receiving payments from payers that are below your contracted rate — and if you’re not systematically checking, you’re writing off money that is contractually yours. This issue also includes the RCM Performance Scorecard — a free downloadable self-assessment tool for benchmarking your practice’s billing performance. Download link is at the bottom of the Billing Corner. |
|
DEEP DIVE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Underpayment Problem Every Practice Has and Most Never Find | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Research on payer payment accuracy consistently shows that 7–11% of commercial claims are paid at rates below the contracted amount. The causes range from fee schedule entry errors at the payer to incorrect plan category assignments to claims processed under outdated versions of your contract. Here is what this looks like in practice. A 6-provider OB/GYN practice started comparing ERA payments against contracted rates for their top 2 payers (Aetna and UnitedHealthcare). In the first month, they identified 34 underpaid claims totaling $8,400 — primarily 99214s paid at the 99213 rate and global OB claims with incorrect fee schedule application. They filed batch disputes using the letter template. Recovery rate: 88% (30 of 34 claims corrected within 45 days). Annualized, this represented $96,000 in revenue their practice had earned but was not receiving. The weekly ERA review takes one billing team member approximately 2 hours per week.
Most practices never check ERA payments against contracted rates. The ones that do find 7–11% underpayment rates. At $2M in annual collections, that’s $140K–$220K. |
The reason most practices don’t catch underpayments is structural: ERA auto-posting is designed for speed and volume, not accuracy. When an ERA is processed and payments are posted, the system confirms that a payment was received, not that the payment matches your contracted rate. Identifying an underpayment requires comparing the ERA payment to a contracted rate reference — something not built into most practices’ standard posting workflow.
Underpayments accumulate quietly. A $12 underpayment on a 99213 happening on every claim for a specific commercial payer over 12 months, at 200 claims per month, is $28,800 in annual revenue that is contractually yours and that you are not collecting. Most practices have multiple underpayment situations active simultaneously without knowing it.
The categories of underpayments that appear most frequently:
Fee schedule errors. Payers maintain internal fee schedule tables that can contain entry errors — incorrect rates for specific CPT codes, or rates from a prior contract period. These errors can persist for years unless someone is comparing ERA payments to contracted rates.
Incorrect plan category assignment. Your contract may have different rates for different plan products — a PPO rate, an HMO rate, a High Deductible plan rate. If a claim is processed under the wrong plan category, the payment may be lower than your contracted rate for the patient’s actual plan.
Bundling errors. Some payers inappropriately bundle codes or reduce payments based on multiple procedure rules that do not apply under your contract. The ERA may show a CO-45 contractual adjustment that is larger than your actual write-off obligation.
Timely payment interest. Many payer contracts and state insurance regulations require payers to pay clean claims within 30–45 days. Claims paid late may entitle you to interest — a contractual right that practices almost never pursue but that represents real money on high-volume underpayments.
|
THREE ACTION STEPS THIS WEEK | ||
|
Complete each step before next Tuesday. | ||
| ||
| ||
|
|
FIVE THINGS WORTH KNOWING | ||||||||||
|
|
BILLING CORNER | |
Free Download — RCM Performance Scorecard | |
|
We built a downloadable RCM Performance Scorecard to go with this issue. It’s a two-page self-assessment that benchmarks your practice across 10 revenue cycle dimensions: denial rate, clean claim rate, Days in AR, net collections rate, AR over 90 days, eligibility verification practices, prior auth process, appeal rate and win rate, payment posting speed, and billing staff training and SOPs.
Each dimension is scored 1–5. A total score of 40–50 indicates top-quartile performance. A score under 25 indicates significant recoverable revenue — typically $80,000–$300,000 or more depending on practice size. The Scorecard is free. It takes about 15 minutes to complete and gives you a precise picture of where your revenue cycle gaps are. Download the RCM Performance Scorecard: [Link to your Beehiiv lead magnet landing page] When you download, we’ll ask for your practice name and a contact number. If your score is under 30, a member of our team will reach out to discuss the specific gaps — no pitch, just a review of your results against the benchmarks. |
|
Underpayment Dispute Letter Template Subject: Underpayment Dispute — [Practice Name] — Claim #[Number] To: [Payer] Provider Dispute Resolution “We are filing a formal underpayment dispute for the following claim(s): Patient: [Name] DOS: [Date] CPT: [Code] Claim #: [Number] Contracted rate: $[Amount] Paid: $[Amount] Underpayment: $[Difference] Per our contract dated [Date], Section [X], the contracted rate for CPT [Code] is $[Amount]. The payment received of $[Amount] is $[Difference] below the contracted rate. We request immediate corrective payment of $[Difference]. Please process within 30 days per [state] prompt payment statute. Thank you.” Tip: File disputes in batches of 10–20 claims per payer per month. Track outcomes in a spreadsheet. Recovery rates on legitimate underpayment disputes exceed 80%. |
|
COMPLIANCE WATCH | |
|
|
PEOPLE & PRACTICE |
Training Your Billing Team to Think |
|
Most billing professionals are trained to think transactionally: a claim comes in, it goes out, a payment arrives, it gets posted. The contractual layer — what the payer is actually obligated to pay per your agreement — is typically not part of billing team training. Adding the contractual layer requires two things: access to the relevant contract terms (which means billing staff need to know where contracts are stored and how to find rate tables), and a habit of checking payments against rates rather than simply posting what arrives. The most effective way to build this habit is to start with a single payer and a single high-volume code. Designate 15 minutes per week for one billing team member to compare that payer’s payments on that code to the contracted rate. When they find their first underpayment — and they will — the exercise becomes immediately real and the habit forms quickly. You don’t need to audit everything simultaneously. Start small, demonstrate the value, and expand the practice as your team builds confidence with the process. |
|
ASK THE PULSE | ||||||
|
|
ONE MORE THING |
|
Payers are large organizations processing millions of claims. Fee schedule entry errors, system migration mistakes, and plan category misassignments happen regularly and are rarely corrected proactively — because there is no internal incentive for the payer to find the errors that cost you money. The only party with the incentive and the ability to identify and dispute underpayments is you. That work is not glamorous, but at 7–11% of claims, it is among the highest-return billing activities available to a practice that hasn’t already addressed it. |
|
|
Enjoying this issue? Get The Practice Pulse delivered every Tuesday at 7 AM. Free. SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRACTICE PULSE | |
|
|
The Practice Pulse · Issue 11 · Every Tuesday at 7 AM |