|
|
THIS WEEK IN PRACTICE |
|
Eight weeks in, and this week we’re covering a topic most practice managers know they should address but never get to: payer contract negotiation. Your contracted rates are the ceiling on every dollar you can collect — and for most independent practices, those rates have been set by the payer, accepted at credentialing, and never revisited. That is leaving real money on the table every single week. |
|
DEEP DIVE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your Contracted Rates Set the Ceiling on Your Revenue — Most Practices Never Renegotiate Them | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most independent practices have at least one payer contract they have never renegotiated. Many have never renegotiated any of them. The rates they are paid today are the rates a payer’s contracting department offered at initial credentialing — rates that reflected minimal negotiating leverage and, in many cases, were below market even then. Here is what this looks like in practice. A 7-provider multi-specialty group had not renegotiated their Blue Cross contract in 6 years. Their rates for 99213 and 99214 were 108% of Medicare — well below the 125–150% benchmark. They sent the rate review letter template, attached a benchmarking sheet comparing their rates to MGMA medians, and highlighted their 2,400 attributed lives and 42% open rate for HEDIS measures. Result: a 14% across-the-board rate increase effective on renewal, representing approximately $95,000 in additional annual revenue on the same patient volume. The entire negotiation took one letter, one phone call, and 3 weeks.
Rates are national averages. Your actual contracted rates should reflect your market, volume, and specialty. Pull your top 20 CPT codes and compare against these benchmarks. |
The average annual operating cost increase for an independent practice is approximately 4–6%. Medicare fee schedules have increased on average less than 1% annually over the same period. Commercial payers that tie their rates to a percentage of Medicare compound this problem: your contracted rates may be actively declining in real terms every year even if the percentage hasn’t changed.
Here is the core argument for renegotiation: payers need your practice in their network. If you are the only or one of few providers in your specialty in a given geographic area, your network necessity is measurable. If you serve a significant number of the payer’s members, your value to their network is concrete. That value is your leverage.
The practices that successfully negotiate better rates share three characteristics: they enter negotiations with data (not just frustration), they make a specific, quantified request (not a general ask for ’more’), and they are genuinely prepared to discuss alternatives if the payer won’t move.
Data means: your current contracted rates compared to Medicare, your contracted rates compared to MGMA or FAIR Health market benchmarks, the number of the payer’s members you serve, and your quality metrics if you have them.
A specific request means: ’We are requesting that CPT [code] be reimbursed at $[X], which represents [Y%] of Medicare, effective [date].’ Not ’we would like higher rates.’
Genuine alternatives means: being enrolled or enrollable with competing plans in your market, and being willing to discuss non-participation as a real option if rates cannot be made sustainable. Most payers move when they believe you will act.
|
THREE ACTION STEPS THIS WEEK | ||
|
Complete each step before next Tuesday. | ||
| ||
| ||
|
|
Rate Review Request Letter Template — Copy and Customize
Subject: Rate Review Request — [Practice Name] — Contract #[Number] Dear [Payer Rep Name], “I am writing to request a formal rate review for our practice, [Practice Name], under contract #[Number] with an effective date of [Date]. Our current contracted rates have not been reviewed in [X] years, and we believe an adjustment is warranted based on the following: (1) Our Medicare-equivalent rates for our top 10 CPT codes are [X%] below the market median for [specialty] practices in [state/region]. (2) Our patient panel includes [X] attributed lives with your plan, representing [X%] of our payer mix. (3) Our quality metrics include: [denial rate, patient satisfaction score, HEDIS measures if applicable]. We are requesting a rate increase of [X%] across all E&M codes effective [date]. I have attached a rate comparison sheet for reference. Please let me know a convenient time to discuss. Thank you.” |
|
FIVE THINGS WORTH KNOWING | ||||||||||
|
|
BILLING CORNER |
Understanding Your ERA — The Underpayment |
|
Most practices review EOBs and ERAs to confirm payment was received and post the amount. Fewer practices review them to confirm the payment was correct — that the payer applied the right fee schedule, the right contracted rate, and the right plan category. Payer underpayments are more common than most practices realize. They arise from fee schedule errors, incorrect plan category assignments, and claims processed under an outdated version of your contract. The workflow that catches underpayments: Step 1: Build a contracted rate reference document. For your top 30 CPT codes by volume, document your contracted rate with each major payer. Step 2: On ERA review, flag any payment that differs from your contracted rate by more than 2%. Small variances may reflect patient cost-share calculations; larger variances are worth investigating. Step 3: For flagged payments, call the payer and ask: ’What fee schedule was used to calculate the payment for claim [number]?’ Compare their answer to your contracted rate reference. Step 4: If the payment is below your contracted rate, file a formal written dispute — not an appeal — citing the specific contract language, the contracted rate, and the underpayment amount. Step 5: Track underpayment disputes and outcomes. If you are consistently underpaid by one payer on one CPT code, that is a contract administration problem warranting escalation to your provider relations contact. |
|
COMPLIANCE WATCH | |
|
|
PEOPLE & PRACTICE |
The Practice Manager’s Role in Payer Contract |
|
In most independent practices, payer contract negotiation either falls on the physician-owner by default or doesn’t happen at all. Neither outcome is optimal. The practice manager is often better positioned to lead this work than the physician: they understand the revenue impact of rate gaps, they have the billing data to support a negotiation case, and they can devote focused time to the process without the clinical schedule interruption that makes it so difficult for physicians to follow through. The practice manager’s role in negotiation is not to make final decisions about contract acceptance or termination — that authority belongs to the physician-owner. But the research, the benchmarking, the letter drafting, the initial conversations with payer contracting staff, and the presentation of findings to the physician are all practice manager functions that can be done well. Build the case. Present the data. Make the recommendation. Let the physician decide. That division of labor is both appropriate and effective. |
|
ASK THE PULSE | ||||||
|
|
ONE MORE THING |
|
Payer contract negotiation is the one revenue cycle improvement that is not about doing more work more consistently. It is about doing one specific piece of work — making a written, data-supported request — that could increase your revenue from a single payer by 8–15% for every claim, every year, indefinitely. Most practices never make the request. The ones that do usually wish they had done it sooner. |
|
|
Enjoying this issue? Get The Practice Pulse delivered every Tuesday at 7 AM. Free. SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRACTICE PULSE | |
|
|
The Practice Pulse · Issue 08 · Every Tuesday at 7 AM |