ISSUE 13 · WEEK 13 · MONTH 3
Coding, Compliance & Audit Defense
Practice team reviewing results

3 months in: the billing improvements that move the needle most

A look at what we’ve covered, what your peers are implementing, and what’s coming.

THIS WEEK IN PRACTICE

Thirteen weeks in — three months of The Practice Pulse. This week we’re doing something different: a retrospective on what we’ve covered, the reader-reported practice improvements from the past 12 issues, and a preview of where we’re going in Month 4.

We also have a quick 5-question survey at the bottom of this issue. It takes 90 seconds and directly shapes the next 3 months of content. We’d genuinely appreciate your input.

 

DEEP DIVE

Three Months of Revenue Cycle Improvements — What Actually Moved the Needle

Twelve issues across three months, covering denial management, no-shows, EHR optimization, prior auth, patient collections, front desk training, HIPAA compliance, payer contract negotiation, E&M coding, OIG audit defense, underpayment recovery, and telehealth billing.

Here is what this looks like in practice. Across the first 500 Practice Pulse readers, the three most-implemented changes were: (1) the monthly denial root cause review (Issue 01) — readers report an average denial rate reduction of 2.5 percentage points within 90 days; (2) the two-touch reminder protocol (Issue 02) — average no-show rate improvement of 3.1 percentage points; and (3) the copay collection script change (Issue 05) — average POS collection rate increase of 12 percentage points. For a typical 5-provider practice, these three changes alone represent approximately $85,000–$140,000 in recovered annual revenue.

$80K–$200K

recoverable annual revenue for a 5-provider practice that implements the processes from Issues 01–12.
Most of it comes from denial reduction, underpayment recovery, and improved collections.

Issue Topic Key Tool Metric to Track Target Improvement
01 Denial root cause analysis CARC cheat sheet + monthly review First-pass denial rate 8% → 4–5% in 6 months
02 No-show reduction Two-touch reminders + fill list No-show rate 8% → 4–5%
03 EHR optimization 5-setting audit checklist Auto-eligibility verification rate 0% → 100% same-day
04 Prior auth workflow Auth tracking log Auth-related denials Reduce 50% in 90 days
05 Patient collections Collections timing matrix POS collection rate 65% → 85%+
06 Front desk training Performance scorecard Copay collection + eligibility rate Track weekly
07 HIPAA check-in audit 7-point audit checklist PHI exposure points Zero findings
08 Payer contract negotiation Rate benchmarking sheet Contracted rates vs. Medicare % 125–150% Medicare
09 E&M coding MDM quick reference Coding accuracy <5% error rate
10 OIG audit defense Internal audit template Self-audit completion Quarterly
11 Underpayment recovery Dispute letter template Underpayments identified Review top 2 payers monthly
12 Telehealth billing 7-element compliance table Telehealth claim error rate <5%

Print this table and use it as your Q1 improvement tracker. Circle the 3 issues most relevant to your practice and focus there first.

Based on your replies across all twelve issues, here is what readers actually implemented and what they reported back:

Denial root cause analysis (Issue 1) — The most implemented change. Multiple readers reported setting up their first monthly denial review process and finding that a single denial code was responsible for 40–60% of their monthly dollar denial volume. The most common root cause identified: timely filing misses from claims that fell out of the clearinghouse queue without anyone noticing.

Two-touch reminder protocol (Issue 2) — The second most reported implementation. Several readers updated their EHR automated reminder settings and reported no-show rate reductions within 30 days. The most common finding: practices that switched from 48-hour reminders to 7-day + 48-hour reminders saw measurable improvement within three to four weeks.

Front desk training assessment (Issue 6) — Multiple practice managers reported using the three assessment questions as an actual Day 30 check-in with a recent hire. Two reported that the exercise identified specific knowledge gaps they were able to address before they showed up as denials.

Payer contract renegotiation (Issue 8) — Several readers sent their first formal rate review request letters. Timelines vary — most commercial payer rate negotiations take 60–120 days to complete — but the letters are in motion. One reader reported receiving a call back from a payer within two weeks of sending the letter.

The HIPAA waiting room walkthrough (Issue 7) — Consistently reported as producing immediate, specific findings. The most common: EHR screens visible from the waiting area and check-in conversations audible to other patients. Both are fixable the same day they’re identified.

The three changes that readers consistently said they were not yet able to implement: internal coding audits (too much bandwidth required right now), underpayment tracking (need to build the contracted rate reference document first), and telehealth billing documentation updates (provider buy-in required, still in progress).

For those three: we will revisit them. The contracted rate reference document is a one-day project. The internal coding audit can be done in 90 minutes. The telehealth documentation template update requires a 30-minute provider meeting. All three are on the Month 4 follow-up agenda.

 

THREE ACTION STEPS THIS WEEK

Complete each step before next Tuesday.

1

Complete the 3-month self-assessment. Before reading Month 4, pull your denial report for last month and compare the top denial codes to the report you pulled at the start of Month 1 (Issue 1 action step). Have the top codes changed? Have the dollar amounts decreased? If you ran the root cause process, what did you fix, and did it work? Document the comparison in a one-paragraph summary. This is your baseline for the next 3 months.
2

Identify the one improvement from the past 12 issues that you started but didn’t finish. From the list above — denial root cause process, two-touch reminder protocol, front desk training, contract negotiation letter, HIPAA walkthrough, coding audit, underpayment tracking, telehealth documentation — pick the one that is most applicable to your practice and most incomplete. Make it the Month 4 priority. One thing finished beats three things started.
3

Complete the 5-question reader survey at the bottom of this issue. Your answers directly determine the topics we cover in Months 4–6. This is not a formality — we read every response and the editorial calendar changes based on what you tell us.
 

FIVE THINGS WORTH KNOWING

1

Practices that implement a monthly denial root cause process reduce their first-pass denial rate by an average of 3–5 percentage points within 6 months — representing $75,000–$150,000 in annual recovered revenue for a 5-provider practice at $2.5M in collections. (MGMA/HFMA combined data)
2

The average independent practice that has never conducted a formal internal coding audit discovers a coding accuracy rate of 82–88% on first audit — meaning 12–18% of sampled claims have documentation that does not cleanly support the billed code level. Most of these are cases where the documentation is incomplete, not where the clinical complexity was incorrectly assessed.
3

Practices that implement a same-day fill list for no-show slots fill an average of 42% of those slots within the first 90 days — recovering approximately $8,000–$22,000 annually at typical no-show rates and average visit values, depending on practice size and specialty.
4

The average commercial payer rate improvement achieved by independent practices that send a formal written rate review request with supporting benchmark data is 8–15% on the first successful negotiation. The majority of practices that send the letter receive a response within 30 days.
5

Practices that build and use a contracted rate reference document for underpayment identification recover an average of $12,000–$45,000 per year in previously undetected underpayments — a figure that compounds as the practice identifies and disputes patterns that have been occurring for months or years.
 

BILLING CORNER

What’s Coming in Month 4 — Advanced RCM and

Month 4 shifts to advanced revenue cycle topics: AR recovery deep dive with week-by-week protocols, Medicare Advantage billing differences from traditional Medicare, credentialing gaps and how to audit them, and a billing team performance review framework.

Your leadership team needs this Q1 summary.

FORWARD TO YOUR TEAM →

We’ll also revisit the three topics from the first three months that had the lowest implementation rates: contracted rate reference document setup (for underpayment tracking), internal coding audit protocol (step by step, start to finish), and telehealth documentation template — with provider buy-in strategies.

If there’s a specific billing or operational topic you want covered in Month 4, reply to this email with your request. Topics with multiple reader requests get priority.

Month 4 starts next Tuesday. See you then.

Quarter 1 Self-Assessment — Complete Before Month 4

1. Denial rate: Pull your denial report for last month. Compare top 5 CARC codes to your Issue 01 baseline. Did any codes drop off? Which ones persisted?

2. No-show rate: What was your no-show rate last month? Is the two-touch reminder protocol running? Is the fill list being worked daily?

3. Collection rate: What percentage of copays were collected at the point of service last month? Is it above or below 80%?

4. Biggest win: Which single change from the past 12 weeks had the most measurable impact on your revenue or operations?

5. Biggest gap: Which issue did you read but never implement? What blocked you? (That’s your Month 4 priority.)

 

COMPLIANCE WATCH

Annual Compliance Reminder — Year-End Actions Before July 1. If your practice year runs January through December, the mid-year compliance checkpoint should happen now. Items to review: HIPAA training records current for all staff; Business Associate Agreements current for all vendors handling PHI; CAQH re-attestation completed for all providers (required every 120 days); payer credentialing status confirmed for any new providers who joined in the past 6 months; and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen standard compliance documentation is current. These are not year-end items — they’re ongoing requirements that should be verified at least twice per year. A missed CAQH re-attestation can result in a provider being listed as inactive by a payer and a billing gap that takes 30–90 days to resolve.

 

PEOPLE & PRACTICE

The Operational Review Every Practice Should Do

Most independent practices have an annual review cycle for operations and strategy. Very few have a 90-day review cycle. The practices that do — that sit down at the 3-month mark and ask ’what is working, what isn’t, and what needs to change before we get to six months’ — consistently outperform those that wait for the annual review to surface problems.

A 90-day operational review doesn’t need to be elaborate. It needs to be honest. Pull three months of data: denial rate trend, Days in AR trend, net collections rate, no-show rate. Compare each to where you started. For each metric that moved in the wrong direction, identify one upstream cause. For each metric that moved in the right direction, identify what changed that produced it.

Then ask the question that most annual reviews never get to: what is the one change we could make in the next 30 days that would have the most impact on our revenue cycle performance? Not the most complex change. Not the most politically difficult change. The most impactful change you can actually execute in a month.

Write it down. Assign it. Measure it. That is a 90-day review.

 

ASK THE PULSE

In place of a single reader question this week, we’re running the 3-month survey. Your responses are the best data we have on what to cover next.

Survey questions (reply to this email with your answers, or use the link if your email client supports it):

1\. Of the 12 topics we’ve covered in the first 3 months, which one generated the most useful change in your practice?

2\. Which topic did you most want to implement but couldn’t — and what got in the way?

3\. What is the billing or operational challenge you’re facing right now that we haven’t covered yet?

4\. Which section of the newsletter do you read most consistently — Deep Dive, Billing Corner, Compliance Watch, People & Practice, or Ask the Pulse?

5\. On a scale of 1–10, how likely are you to recommend The Practice Pulse to a colleague? (And if it’s below an 8, what would make it higher?)

Your answers go directly into the Month 4–6 editorial calendar. We read every one.

Quick picks — tap one to vote for a future topic:

AR recovery Staff performance
Vendor evaluation Practice growth
SEND US YOUR QUESTION →
 

ONE MORE THING

Three months is a real thing. Most newsletters don’t make it to three months — not because the content isn’t good, but because consistency is genuinely hard and the second month is always the hardest.

You’re still here. So are we. Month 4 starts next Tuesday — and based on what you’ve been asking about, it’s going to be a good one. See you then.

 

COMING NEXT TUESDAY

Hiring billing staff: job descriptions that attract the right people

Month 4 begins with operations and staffing.

Enjoying this issue?

Get The Practice Pulse delivered every Tuesday at 7 AM. Free.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE PRACTICE PULSE

www.practicepulseweekly.com

Know a practice manager who’d find this useful?  Forward this issue →

The Practice Pulse · Issue 13 · Every Tuesday at 7 AM
www.practicepulseweekly.com

Keep Reading

© 2026 The Practice Pulse.
beehiivPowered by beehiiv